September 30, 2026

Interpreting Joel 2 and the Nature of Joel’s Army

prophecy

Question

Does Joel 2:2-11 describe an army of great people, an army of locusts, or something else?

Originally published in Vol. 1, Number 9, September 2026, Ask The Theologian Journal.

Answer

Joel 2:1–11 presents a formidable invading force associated with the approaching “day of the Lord.” The question is whether this force is (1) a literal human army, (2) a locust plague described in military terms, or (3) a more complex, possibly otherworldly, host symbolized by locust imagery.

Key observations from Joel 2:1–11

The passage opens with an alarm:

“Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain... for the day of the Lord cometh, for it is nigh at hand;” (Joel 2:1)

Then describes:

Repeated similes (“as,” “like”) indicate Joel uses figurative comparisons. The text does not straightforwardly answer whether the underlying reality is insect or human; rather, it blends imagery.

Connection with Joel 1 and locust imagery

Joel 1 strongly emphasizes a devastating locust invasion:

“That which the palmerworm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm hath left hath the caterpiller eaten.” (Joel 1:4)

Shortly thereafter, the invading force is called “a nation” (Joel 1:6), language often used of peoples but here apparently applied to the consuming swarm.

Many interpreters see chapter 1 describing a literal, historical locust plague, and chapter 2 using that plague as the pattern or metaphor for a future, more terrible invasion associated with the day of the Lord. On that reading:

Human army, locusts, or something else?

Three main options arise:

1. A human army only.

Some see Joel 2 as a poetic description of a human military invasion (e.g., Assyrian, Babylonian). The discipline, battle array, and impact on inhabitants fit this. However, details such as falling on the sword and not being wounded (Joel 2:8) and their swarm-like characteristics suggest something beyond ordinary soldiers.

2. A locust plague only.

Others read Joel 2 as a heightened description of the same or a similar locust invasion. The earlier chapter favors the locust background. Yet the very martial language (battle array, mighty men, climbing walls like men of war) stretches insect imagery to the limit and may be typological of something greater.

3. A prophetic, possibly otherworldly, army symbolized by locusts.

A more nuanced view sees:

For instance, Daniel 2:43 speaks of a future mixture that “shall mingle themselves with the seed of men, but they shall not cleave one to another,” which many have taken as suggesting an other-than-human component in end-time powers. When this is set alongside Joel’s language of invulnerability to the sword and the almost supernatural coordination of the host, an otherworldly or transhuman element becomes at least a plausible reading.

Caution regarding “Joel’s army” as the triumphant church

Certain latter-rain and hyper-charismatic movements have popularized the notion of “Joel’s army” as a final generation of extraordinary believers, endowed with superior spiritual powers, who will conquer the world, overcome all demonic opposition, and establish a dominion before Christ returns. This interpretation often goes hand-in-hand with a postmillennial or dominionist outlook.

This reading is highly problematic:

It is better to avoid using “Joel’s army” language to describe a supposed end-time super-church.

A restrained conclusion

Given the mixture of locust and military imagery and the eschatological setting, the safest synthesis is:

Thus, we can say that Joel 2 portrays a divinely directed, end-time army analogous to an all-consuming locust swarm, used by the Lord as His instrument in the day of the Lord. But we should refrain from dogmatic identification beyond what the text clearly supports.