Reconciliation at the Cross and the Death of Ananias and Sapphira

The question hinges on 2 Corinthians 5:19 and on the narrative of Acts 5. Paul writes:

"God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation." 2 Corinthians 5:19

Yet in Acts we read of Ananias and Sapphira, who lied about the proceeds of a sale, and:

"Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost." Acts 5:5

His wife soon likewise fell down dead (Acts 5:10). Their trespass appears to be imputed to them in the most severe way. How can these realities be reconciled?

Reconciliation accomplished vs. reconciliation applied

2 Corinthians 5:19 speaks of what God was doing "in Christ"—that is, in Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection. At the cross, God accomplished a work of reconciliation toward the world: He set in place a new way of dealing with humanity in which He would not impute trespasses in the same manner as under the previous economy.

However, the accomplishment of reconciliation and the historical application of its benefits are not identical in time. The cross is the basis; the proclamation and dispensation of that reconciliation come later, specifically through Paul’s ministry. The verse itself notes that God "hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation." That word, and the order built upon it, must be historically introduced.

Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5 live in the early chapters of Acts, when the kingdom message to Israel is still being proclaimed and the offer of the kingdom is still on the table. They belong to that kingdom context, not yet to the developed administration of the dispensation of grace as later revealed to Paul.

Ananias and Sapphira in a kingdom setting

In Acts 5:1--11, the sin of Ananias and Sapphira is lying to the Holy Spirit regarding a pledged gift. Peter says:

"Why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land?" Acts 5:3

Their immediate deaths are a covenantal, kingdom-style judgment within the community that is anticipating the restoration of the kingdom to Israel (cf. Acts 1:6). In such a setting, God’s direct judgment upon sin, including physical death, is consistent with how He dealt with Israel under the law and in kingdom-related situations.

In the kingdom program:

• Sin is dealt with concretely, often through sacrificial offerings or direct judgments.
• The holiness of the community in relation to the presence of God is guarded through immediate consequences.

Thus, in the kingdom era of early Acts, God still holds trespasses against individuals in a direct, temporal way as part of His dealings with Israel under that program.

The dispensation of grace and non-imputation of trespasses

The "not imputing their trespasses unto them" of 2 Corinthians 5:19 characterizes God’s stance toward the world in the dispensation of grace. In this administration, based on the finished work of Christ, God is not counting sins in the way He did under the law and kingdom offer. That is why, in our era, we do not see people struck dead for lying about an offering, or becoming sick and dying en masse at the Lord’s table as in 1 Corinthians 11:30.

It appears that once the kingdom offer to Israel is withdrawn and the distinctive dispensation of grace is in operation, God does not directly execute temporal judgments like that of Ananias and Sapphira upon individual believers as covenant sanctions. He deals with humanity on the ground of reconciled favor, calling them to receive the gift that rests on the cross-work already accomplished.

So why did they die?

We can therefore say:

• At the cross, God in Christ accomplished the work of reconciliation.
• That reconciliation, with its feature of non-imputation of trespasses, is historically applied and made operative in the dispensation of grace, revealed and expounded through Paul.
• Ananias and Sapphira lived and died before that dispensation was fully in place, within the kingdom-related phase of God’s dealings with Israel, where covenantal judgments for sin were still in operation.

Their deaths are consistent with kingdom-era judgment, not with the fully revealed administration of reconciliation later set forth in 2 Corinthians 5. God reconciled the world to Himself at the cross, but He did not immediately alter every aspect of His historical dealings with Israel until the kingdom offer was set aside and the dispensation of grace was in force.

questiontransition