Christ and the Godhead in Light of 1 Corinthians 11:3

The apparent difficulty arises from conflating two different uses of the word "head’’ in English and from misunderstanding the historical sense of "Godhead.’’ In 1 Corinthians 11:3, "head’’ is used in a functional, relational sense—headship, authority, or leadership. In other passages, "Godhead’’ does not mean "God’s head’’ or "the One who is over God,’’ but rather "Godhood’’—the state or nature of being God.

Historically, "Godhead’’ in English is parallel to words like "childhood,’’ "manhood,’’ "priesthood,’’ and "brotherhood.’’ The old suffix -hood (later spelled in some cases as -head) denotes the state, rank, or quality of something. Childhood is the state of being a child; manhood, the state of being a man; priesthood, the office or condition of a priest. So "Godhead’’ (etymologically "Godhood’’) means the state or nature of being God—the full complex of attributes, essence, and glory that constitute deity.

When Scripture says, for example, that in Christ "dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily’’ (Colossians 2:9), it is saying that everything that belongs to the nature of God resides in Christ in bodily form. He possesses the whole of deity, the entire true Godhood. This is not a statement about hierarchy within the Trinity but about the fullness of divine nature in the incarnate Son.

By contrast, 1 Corinthians 11:3 addresses order and roles:

"But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.’’

Here "head’’ speaks of a relational ordering. The man is head of the woman in the sense of functional leadership within the marriage or assembly context; Christ is head of the man; God is head of Christ. This is not a statement that Christ is less than God in essence, any more than a husband’s headship implies that his wife is less human. It describes a pattern of relational subordination or order, not inequality of nature.

The New Testament therefore affirms both that:

• Christ fully shares the Godhead—He possesses the entire nature of God.
• In the incarnate economy, Christ voluntarily occupies a role in which the Father is His "head’’ in terms of authority and mission.

These two truths are not contradictory once we distinguish essence from role. In His person, the Son is truly and fully God, sharing the Godhood without diminution. In His incarnate mission and mediatorial office, He acts in functional subordination to the Father, which is what 1 Corinthians 11:3 is describing. The linguistic accident that "Godhood’’ came to be spelled "Godhead’’ in English unfortunately invites confusion with the separate notion of "head’’ as leader, but historically and theologically the terms arise from different roots and carry distinct meanings.

questiontransition