July 27, 2026

Humanity in the Image of God and Christ as the Image

Question: Colossians 1:15, speaking of Christ, says, "who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature." Are we in the image of the invisible God like Jesus?

Originally published in Vol. 1, Number 7, Ask The Theologian Journal.

Colossians 1:15 says of Christ, "who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature." Genesis 1:27 says, "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." Both statements involve the "image of God," but they are not speaking in an identical sense.

There is an important distinction between Christ, who is the image of the invisible God, and humanity, which is created in the image of God. The wording reflects a theological difference, not mere stylistic variety.

Christ as the Image of the Invisible God

In Colossians 1:15, Christ is presented as the visible manifestation of the invisible God. Parallel passages reinforce this:

"Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power dots" Hebrews 1:3

Christ is the exact representation and radiance of God’s own essence. He does not merely reflect God in certain attributes; He shares and reveals God’s very being. This is why such texts place Christ squarely within the Godhead.

Humanity in the Image of God

By contrast, Genesis teaches that humanity is made "in" the image of God. Humanity is not the image in the same intrinsic sense as Christ. Rather, humans are image-bearers or replicas that reflect God in limited, creaturely ways.

Being in God’s image includes such things as:

  • Personal nature: intellect, will, emotions.
  • Moral capacity: awareness of right and wrong, sense of justice.
  • Relational capacity: ability to love and be loved.
  • Creative capacity: the ability to design, build, imagine.

A systematic-theological way of expressing this is: humanity is made in God’s image and reflects some of His communicable attributes (love, justice, creativity), while incommunicable attributes (such as eternality, omniscience, omnipotence) belong to God alone.

An Analogy: Original and Replica

An analogy may clarify the difference. Consider a great sculpture, such as Michelangelo’s David:

  • The original work is the definitive expression of Michelangelo’s artistic conception.
  • A replica or cast may closely resemble it and genuinely reflect its form, but it is not the original.

Likewise:

  • Christ is the image of the invisible God—the original, perfect manifestation of God’s being.
  • Humanity is created in the image of God—genuine image-bearers, but finite, derivative, and marred by sin.

The analogy is imperfect, but it captures the central distinction: Christ uniquely and fully reveals God; we reflect Him in a derived and limited way.

Like Jesus, Yet Not Identical

So, are we in the image of the invisible God like Jesus?

  • Yes, in the sense that both Christ and humanity have a relationship to the "image of God" language and that humans were designed to reflect God’s character in created form.
  • No, in the crucial sense that Christ, as the Son, is the image in a unique ontological way we do not share. He is God manifest; we are creatures.

We are created image-bearers; Jesus is the image of the invisible God. That distinction preserves both His unique status as Son and our real, yet dependent, participation as those made in God’s image.

newpage