Gentile Grafting and Faith in Romans 11

Romans 11:13--22 employs the picture of an olive tree, with natural branches representing Israel and wild branches representing Gentiles. My position is that these wild branches signify the Gentile world as such, not specifically the body of Christ, the church.

Verse 20 says of the wild branches: "Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear." The question is: whose faith, and of what sort, is in view?

The Nature of the Faith in Romans 11:20

In the Greek, the phrase is literally, "but thou, by the faith, standest." The construction joins "faith" and "standest" without an explicit preposition. English translators supply "by" or "through." Grammatically, "faith" is the basis or ground on which the standing takes place.

However, the grammar does not require that every individual Gentile branch already personally possesses saving faith. Rather, Paul is describing the principle on which the Gentile position stands before God in this phase of his dealings: the ground is faith, not ethnic privilege or works of law.

In context:

• Israel’s natural branches were broken off "because of unbelief" (lack of faith).
• The Gentile position is characterized by faith as the divinely appointed condition for standing.
• If this faith-principle is abandoned on the Gentile side, there is a warning of being cut off.

On my reading, the "standing by faith" describes the character of the Gentile place in God’s plan, not a guarantee that every grafted-in Gentile is personally a believer. Gentiles as a class have been given access to blessing on the basis of faith.

This also helps explain how the warning of being "cut off" works. Applied collectively, it warns that if the Gentile nations turn away from the principle of faith and embrace unbelief, God can and will remove them from their privileged position, just as he did with unbelieving Israel.

If, instead, we individualize it as each Christian standing by his personal faith, then the text becomes a proof for loss of personal salvation or of one’s grafted-in status upon loss of faith. The collective reading avoids that theological difficulty and fits Paul’s larger corporate argument in Romans 9--11.

Are the Grafted-In Gentiles Proselytes to Judaism?

The second question is whether the grafted-in Gentiles might be Gentile proselytes to Judaism rather than the Gentile world at large.

Grammatically, Romans 11 does not exclude the possibility that Paul is thinking of Gentiles who, in some sense, participate in Israel’s religious life. However, several observations are important:

• The olive tree in Romans 11 represents the sphere of God’s covenantal plan and blessing, not merely the legal structure of Judaism.
• The contrast Paul develops is between Israel as a nation and the Gentiles as nations, not simply between ethnic Jews and proselytes.
• Paul explicitly addresses "you Gentiles" Romans 11:13 and warns them corporately about boasting against Jewish branches. The scope is larger than a subset of proselytes.

Acts 28 dispensationalism often reads Romans 11 as describing Gentile proselytes entering a Jewish framework that continues until Acts 28, after which the body of Christ begins. From that perspective, one might argue that the wild branches are Gentile proselytes to a still-operating Israel-centered program.

I do not adopt that Acts 28 approach. In my understanding:

• The wild branches signify Gentile peoples now included within the sphere of God’s dealings on the principle of faith.
• This inclusion does not mean Gentiles are grafted into the nation of Israel itself; rather, they are grafted into God’s plan and purpose, which had previously been focused on Israel alone.
• The "standing by faith" is the description of the new basis of participation in that plan, as opposed to Israel’s former place based on promise and covenantal election.

So, could someone construct a grammatical argument that the grafted-in Gentiles are proselytes to Judaism? One might attempt such a reading, especially from an Acts 28 standpoint. But:

• it does not best fit the national, corporate argument of Romans 11,
• it is not required by the Greek text,
• and it blurs the distinction between Israel as a covenant nation and the Gentile world which is temporarily elevated to a privileged status.

My conclusion is that:

1. "Thou standest by faith" refers to the Gentile position grounded on the principle of faith, corporately considered.
2. The wild branches represent the Gentile world at large in God’s plan, not specifically Gentile proselytes to Judaism, and not specifically the church as a spiritual Israel grafted into the nation.

newpage