Evaluating a Christ-Centered Hermeneutic and Its Limits
Question: Hi Randy, actually the Bible is not about us. It should be Christ centered, right?
The claim that the Bible should be “Christ centered” captures something important but can be oversimplified in ways that flatten Scripture and obscure key distinctions. Christ is indeed the ultimate focus and culmination of God’s plan; all things are ultimately brought under Him. Yet it does not follow that every passage is directly “about” Christ or that we should read Christ into every detail.
If we insist that everything in Scripture must be directly about Christ, we risk erasing the real variety present in the text: covenants with Israel, promises to specific patriarchs, laws, historical narratives, wisdom literature, and detailed prophecies concerning nations and events. A hermeneutic that forces Christ into every line tends to ignore these contextual and dispensational details and to reduce the Bible to a single, undifferentiated theme.
A more careful approach is often called the historical-grammatical-literal method. It seeks first to understand each passage in its historical setting, according to normal grammar and vocabulary, and in its immediate literary and theological context. When a text is speaking of Israel’s land promises, for instance, we should let it be about Israel’s land promises, not immediately convert it into a figure of speech for Christ or the church. When it is recounting historical events, we should let it be history.
Christ’s centrality is not denied by this. Rather, His centrality is seen in the way all the distinct parts of Scripture ultimately converge in Him: He fulfills the law, confirms the promises made to the fathers, brings the kingdom, and is the head of the body. But that convergence is richer and clearer when we do not prematurely collapse all texts into a single Christological reading.
So, while it is theologically sound to say that Scripture, in its grand design, culminates in Christ, it is hermeneutically safer to speak of a historical-grammatical-literal reading than to use “Christ centered” in a way that erases the differences between Israel and the body of Christ, between law and grace, and between the various covenants and dispensations found in the Bible.
newpage