Moses, the Two Witnesses, and the Question of Fading Glory

The question assumes that Moses experienced a kind of “fading glory” after being in the presence of the Lord, and then asks whether the two witnesses in Revelation 11 share a similar pattern. To address this, we must first examine carefully what the text actually says about Moses, and then what it actually says about the two witnesses. Only then can we responsibly compare the two.

The traditional assumption is that Moses’ face shone for a time after each encounter with the Lord and then gradually faded, and that the veil was used only while that radiance slowly diminished. This idea is widespread, but we must test it by close reading rather than by habit or popular theology.

Moses’ Shining Face in Exodus 34

The key passage is Exodus 34:29–35. The text states:

"And it came to pass, when Moses came down from mount Si- with the two tables of testimony in Moses' hand, when he came down from the mount, that Moses wist not that the skin of his face shone while he talked with him. And when Aaron and all the children of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face shone; and they were afraid to come nigh him. And Moses called unto them; and Aaron and all the rulers of the congregation returned unto him: and Moses talked with them. And afterward all the children of Israel came nigh: and he gave them in commandment all that the textscLord had spoken with him in mount Si-. And till Moses had done speaking with them, he put a vail on his face. But when Moses went in before the textscLord to speak with him, he took the vail off, until he came out. And he came out, and spake unto the children of Israel that which he was commanded. And the children of Israel saw the face of Moses, that the skin of Moses' face shone: and Moses put the vail upon his face again, until he went in to speak with him."

Several observations arise from the wording:

1. The shining is directly connected to Moses’ speaking with the Lord. 2. The people fear the radiance of his face. 3. Moses uses a veil in relation to that radiance. 4. There is a repeated cycle described: going in before the Lord, removing the veil; coming out, speaking; the Israelites seeing the shining face; and Moses putting the veil back on “again, until he went in to speak with him.”

The crucial issue is whether the text explicitly describes the glory as fading gradually, or whether it suggests a continued, recurring radiance whenever Moses returns from the presence of the Lord.

The text never actually says that the glory fades away from Moses’ face over time. Instead, it describes a pattern: when Moses goes in before the Lord, he removes the veil; he then comes out, speaks what he is commanded, the people see that his face shines, and then he puts the veil on “again, until he went in to speak with him.”

On a straightforward reading, that sequence can be taken in at least two ways:

• The traditional way: the glow is temporary, so the veil is needed only for a time; eventually the glow fades and the veil is no longer needed.
• An alternative way: after the glory first appears, Moses regularly lives and ministers with that radiance, veiled in public, unveiled in the presence of the Lord, and the veil becomes his normal public state from that point forward.

The second reading is not eliminated by the text. Once the veil is introduced, the only explicitly mentioned time it is removed is “when Moses went in before the textscLord to speak with him.” The passage never clearly says, “and the radiance faded away,” nor does it explicitly tell us that the veil ceased to be necessary at some later point.

It is also true that later narratives about Moses do not keep mentioning the veil. But that silence is not conclusive. Narratives often stop repeating details that have become standard or assumed (for example, his staff, his sandals, and so forth). The absence of later mention does not prove that the glory had ceased, only that the writers saw no need to repeat the veil detail in every scene.

Paul’s Use of Moses’ Veil in 2 Corinthians 3

Many appeal to 2 Corinthians 3:7–13 to argue for a fading glory on Moses’ face. The passage says, among other things:

"But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: How shall not the ministration of the Spirit be rather glorious? ... For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious. Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech: And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished."

At first glance, “which glory was to be done away” might be taken to mean that the radiance on Moses’ face was destined to fade. However, when we follow Paul’s argument, “that which is done away” in verse 11 is best understood as the ministry of the law itself, not merely the light on Moses’ face.

Paul’s contrast is between:

• “the ministration of death” and “the ministration of condemnation,” which “was glorious” but is now “done away,” and
• “the ministration of the Spirit” and “the ministration of righteousness,” which “remaineth” and exceeds in glory.

Moses’ veil is used illustratively for Israel’s inability to see the end or full meaning of that now-abolished ministry of the law. Paul is not primarily giving a physics lesson on how long Moses’ face stayed bright; he is building a theological contrast between two covenants and using the veil as an image for Israel’s present blindness when “Moses is read.”

Thus, 2 Corinthians 3 shows that the law’s glory was temporary and has been surpassed. It does not clearly demand that Moses’ facial radiance was gradually decaying in the way later theology has often imagined. The “fading” concerns the covenant, not necessarily the luminosity of Moses’ skin as such.

Is a Permanent or Long-Lasting Glory Possible for Moses?

Given the ambiguity, one could at least entertain the possibility that once the radiance began, Moses’ face continued to bear that glory as long as the Sinai covenant retained its status as the operative administration of God’s dealings with Israel. In that understanding:

• Moses would wear the veil routinely in public to shield Israel from the overwhelming glory.
• He would remove it only before the Lord.
• The veil’s existence symbolized the enduring glory of the covenant written on stone, even though that covenant was destined to be superseded.

This view emphasizes continuity of glory, not gradual leakage. Only when the law is set aside in God’s redemptive plan (in Paul’s sense) does its covenantal glory cease to function.

The Two Witnesses in Revelation 11

Turning to Revelation 11:3–7, we read:

"And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth. These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth. And if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed. These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy: and have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to smite the earth with all plagues, as often as they will. And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them."

Several clear statements about the two witnesses emerge:

• Their power is explicitly granted: “I will give power unto my two witnesses.”
• Their ministry has a definite time span: 1,260 days.
• During that period, they exercise devastating, miraculous powers (fire, drought, plagues).
• During that same period, attempts to harm them are divinely thwarted: “if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth.”
• A decisive transition occurs “when they shall have finished their testimony.” At that point, the beast is allowed to “overcome them, and kill them.”

What the text does not say is that their power gradually diminishes over that period. There is no description of a tapering-off of miracles, no hint that their protective authority ebbs away little by little. Instead, the picture is of full, inviolable power so long as their testimony is active, followed by a sudden change of status at its completion.

Thus, if we speak of their power ending, it appears to be an appointed, discontinuous event, not a slow leak. Until the moment marked by “when they shall have finished their testimony,” they are untouchable. After that point, they can be slain. The text suggests a divinely timed withdrawal of protection, not a long decay in power.

Comparison Between Moses and the Two Witnesses

With those textual observations in hand, we can compare.

Source and Character of Their Glory/Power

Moses’ radiance and the witnesses’ power both clearly derive from direct connection with the Lord:

• Moses’ shining face comes from speaking with the Lord on the mountain.
• The two witnesses stand as “two olive trees” and “two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth,” imagery drawn from Zechariah 4, where the supply of oil (power) flows directly from the Lord.

In that sense, there is a conceptual similarity: nearness to God results in manifest glory or power.

Duration and Pattern

However, when we ask about “gradual leakage and decay,” the connection becomes tenuous.

• For Moses, Scripture never explicitly says the radiance fades gradually; it may have been recurring and sustained, requiring a continuing veil.
• For the two witnesses, Scripture shows them operating in full power until an appointed end, after which they are suddenly vulnerable and killed. There is no description of a gradual weakening.

If anything, the pattern in Revelation 11 is binary: empowered and protected during their prophesying; then, by divine decision, exposed and killed when their task is complete.

Covenantal Dimension

Paul’s use of Moses’ veil in 2 Corinthians 3 connects the radiance not only to Moses personally but to the covenantal glory of the law. That glory, as a covenant, “was to be done away” in the sense that it would be surpassed and set aside in God’s redemptive plan.

By analogy, the two witnesses function within a specific eschatological administration. Their miraculous ministry is covenantally bounded: it endures exactly as long as their God-assigned testimony does. When that appointed role concludes, their special protection ceases.

Thus there is an underlying similarity in that both Moses’ radiance and the witnesses’ power are tied to the status and purpose of a particular administration:

• The Sinai covenant’s glory endures as long as that covenant is operative.
• The witnesses’ power endures as long as their testimony is divinely appointed.

But that is not the same as saying both experience a slow fading of visible glory, like a battery wearing down.

Assessing the “Gradual Leakage” Analogy

The picture of “gradual leakage and decay” is more imaginative than textual. It may be influenced by assumptions, artwork, or cinematic portrayals rather than by the words of Scripture.

For Moses:

• The text allows at least the possibility of continuous or regularly renewed radiance that requires ongoing veiling.
• 2 Corinthians 3 teaches the eventual setting aside of the law’s glory, but focuses on the covenant’s status rather than on a slow dimming of Moses’ face.

For the two witnesses:

• They operate in undiminished power for a fixed period.
• They are invulnerable until their mission is finished.
• Their loss of protection appears sudden and tied to the divine timetable, not a drawn-out decline.

If one wanted to draw a cautious analogy, it would be this: in both cases, visible glory or power is entirely contingent on God’s purpose and timing. When that purpose shifts or concludes, the associated manifestation can cease. But Scripture does not support a detailed parallel of a slow, measurable “leaking” of glory in either case.

A Note on Speculation and Careful Reading

The question raises a valuable methodological lesson. Even when an issue has limited doctrinal consequence, it can serve as a training ground for careful exegesis. Habitual assumptions—“everyone knows Moses’ glory faded,” or “everyone knows the witnesses lose power gradually”—should always be brought back to the text.

By pressing the wording of Exodus 34, 2 Corinthians 3, and Revelation 11, we see that:

• Some common ideas are less textually grounded than often assumed.
• Scripture gives us clear covenantal and temporal boundaries for glory and power, but not detailed mechanics of “glory decay.”
• The two witnesses’ power ends not by slow erosion but by a specific divine decision at the close of their testimony.

Therefore, the notion that the two witnesses’ power and glory are “like that of Moses, subject to a gradual leakage and decay,” goes beyond what the text clearly teaches. Both Moses and the witnesses display God-given glory and power limited by His purpose and timing, but Scripture does not describe either case as gradual diminishment in the way the question suggests.

questiontransition